A proposed regulation from the California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) could severely restrict access to effective cannabis therapies for pets — and public input is urgently needed.
The DCC is suggesting a limit of just 1 mg of THC per package for all pet-specific cannabis products. This extreme restriction would make many formulations ineffective, and it directly contradicts both veterinary best practices and the original intent of Assembly Bill 1885, which was passed to ensure safe, regulated access to cannabis products for animals.
Limiting THC to 1 mg per package would:
Block the use of full-spectrum cannabis, which relies on a balance of cannabinoids — including small, safe amounts of THC — to be effective.
Force producers to rely on CBD isolate only, an ingredient already widely available through the unregulated hemp market.
Risk harm by pushing pet owners toward unregulated or human cannabis products, increasing chances of accidental overdose or toxic ingredient exposure.
Disregard modern veterinary guidance, which supports CBD:THC ratios like 10:1, not arbitrary THC caps.
These changes would leave pet owners with fewer safe, regulated options and make it harder for veterinarians to recommend products that actually work.
The public comment period is open until June 23, 2025 — and every voice matters.
Subject line: DCC-2025-02-R: Animal Cannabis Product Standards
What to include: Paste a pre-written letter or share your own message. If you’ve used cannabis for pet care, include your story — personal experiences carry weight.
Dear Members of the Department of Cannabis Control,
I write today as a concerned California resident and pet owner to strongly oppose the proposed regulation limiting THC in pet‐specific cannabis products to no more than 1 mg per package.
I wholeheartedly support the Department’s goal of establishing safe, responsible oversight for cannabis-derived therapies for companion animals, which was the core intent of Assembly Bill 1885. However, I believe the proposed 1 mg THC-per-package limit will create unintended consequences that run counter to this goal. I would like to propose an alternative, ratio-based approach that I believe more effectively ensures both safety and therapeutic access for pets.
Aligning with the Existing Market to Ensure Viability and Safety
The current hemp market provides an important context. Under the 2018 Farm Bill, legally available hemp-derived pet CBD tinctures often contain 1000 mg of CBD and 25-40 mg of THC per package while remaining under the 0.3% THC threshold.
A 1 mg THC limit for dispensary products would present two significant challenges:
Adopting Veterinary Best Practices Based on CBD:THC Ratios
From a veterinary standpoint, the safety and efficacy of a cannabis product for pets are best managed by the ratio of CBD to THC, rather than a flat THC cap. A required minimum CBD:THC ratio (e.g., 10:1 or higher) is the clinical standard for ensuring therapeutic benefit without intoxication.
Small, ratio-controlled amounts of THC are critical for the “entourage effect,” which enhances CBD’s ability to relieve pain, reduce anxiety, inflammation, nausea, appetite loss, counteract seizures, and even provide anti-cancer benefits. A 1 mg THC per package limit would make it impossible to provide an effective dose for many conditions, especially in medium to large-sized animals.
Preventing Unintended Risks to Pet Health
If the regulated pet products are not therapeutically effective, loving pet owners may feel forced to turn to cannabis products intended for humans. This introduces significant risks, as human products may:
The purpose of AB 1885 is to create a safe harbor for pet owners. An overly restrictive THC limit would inadvertently guide them toward these riskier alternatives.
Proposed Solution: A Ratio-Based Standard
To create a safe, effective, and viable regulated market, I respectfully propose the DCC revise the proposed regulation to focus on ratios, consistent with current veterinary guidance. I suggest the following language:
“Pet cannabis products shall not exceed a ratio of 10:1 CBD:THC per package (i.e., for every 10 mg of CBD, no more than 1 mg of THC), and the total THC content shall not exceed the per-package limit currently allowed for human cannabis products.”
This approach provides a more effective framework because it:
For over a decade, California pet owners and veterinarians have seen the benefits of third-party tested, ratio-specific cannabis products. By adopting a CBD:THC ratio standard, the DCC can successfully fulfill the goals of AB 1885—ensuring California’s pets have access to the safe, appropriate, and effective therapies they deserve.
Thank you for your time and for your commitment to this important issue.
Sincerely,
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.